<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Having a Scarphing Good Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900</link>
	<description>Woodworking powered by Snickers and Milky Way bars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:57:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowsprite</title>
		<link>http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900&#038;cpage=1#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>bowsprite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I think I am drawing on a lumberyard bench! well, maybe &#039;lumberyard bench&#039; is too fancy a term. it&#039;s dunnage. So relaxing, the idea of waiting for glue to cure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am drawing on a lumberyard bench! well, maybe &#8216;lumberyard bench&#8217; is too fancy a term. it&#8217;s dunnage. So relaxing, the idea of waiting for glue to cure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJH</title>
		<link>http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900&#038;cpage=1#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>TJH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900#comment-232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used 6:1 for these types of low-stress scarf joints.  You&#039;ll see anywhere from 6:1 to 12:1 depending on the scarfs application.  I am in the process of gluing up some 12:1 scarfs for birdsmouth mast staves.

The thought of scarfing plywood seems to produce a lot of anxiety for first-timers.  All sorts of methods have been conceived to produce &quot;perfect&quot; tapers when, as you already know, it is very easy to do with a handplane and perfection is not necessary when using epoxy as an adhesive.

I&#039;ve tried scarfed planks, payson joints (butt joints sided with fiberglass tape set in epoxy), and butt blocks.  I&#039;ve had the best success with scarfs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used 6:1 for these types of low-stress scarf joints.  You&#8217;ll see anywhere from 6:1 to 12:1 depending on the scarfs application.  I am in the process of gluing up some 12:1 scarfs for birdsmouth mast staves.</p>
<p>The thought of scarfing plywood seems to produce a lot of anxiety for first-timers.  All sorts of methods have been conceived to produce &#8220;perfect&#8221; tapers when, as you already know, it is very easy to do with a handplane and perfection is not necessary when using epoxy as an adhesive.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried scarfed planks, payson joints (butt joints sided with fiberglass tape set in epoxy), and butt blocks.  I&#8217;ve had the best success with scarfs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900&#038;cpage=1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900#comment-218</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely right Mike. It is 6:1. I used what CLC recommended in the manual and didn&#039;t even think to double check the math.  I&#039;ve often read that 8:1 is a good minimum slope and I think that&#039;s why I jumped to the erroneous conclusion about 8:1. I won&#039;t argue with CLC&#039;s success. If they like 6:1, it must work.

Well, the joins are mostly cured now and look pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely right Mike. It is 6:1. I used what CLC recommended in the manual and didn&#8217;t even think to double check the math.  I&#8217;ve often read that 8:1 is a good minimum slope and I think that&#8217;s why I jumped to the erroneous conclusion about 8:1. I won&#8217;t argue with CLC&#8217;s success. If they like 6:1, it must work.</p>
<p>Well, the joins are mostly cured now and look pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GIS - Sacramento - Page 24 - Woodwork Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900&#038;cpage=1#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>GIS - Sacramento - Page 24 - Woodwork Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900#comment-217</guid>
		<description>[...]  Thanks.  Bob    Bob  Another Bob who is building a boat (Bob Easton) has just posted to his blog on how he made the scrfs with a plane in the ply for his latest boat. I think the idea of using a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Thanks.  Bob    Bob  Another Bob who is building a boat (Bob Easton) has just posted to his blog on how he made the scrfs with a plane in the ply for his latest boat. I think the idea of using a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Siemsen</title>
		<link>http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900&#038;cpage=1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Siemsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bob-easton.com/blog/?p=900#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Bob,
I am confused, for an 8:1 ratio wouldn&#039;t the offset be 2 inches? 1/4 x 8 = 8/4.
You have a 6:1 ratio, 1/4 x 6 = 6/4 or 1 1/2. Is the 8 a typo?
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,<br />
I am confused, for an 8:1 ratio wouldn&#8217;t the offset be 2 inches? 1/4 x 8 = 8/4.<br />
You have a 6:1 ratio, 1/4 x 6 = 6/4 or 1 1/2. Is the 8 a typo?<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
